Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date: 2008-04-02 00:35:17
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10804011735h4083d06bv693f2fd2cd9cd1e1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if all of those changes are net positive for PostgreSQL
> though, they weren't last time I played with this.

I fixed most of the bugs of JDBCBench I found when I benchmarked
Sequoia a long time ago. Totally forgot about it. I'll see if I can
find the sources somewhere.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2008-04-02 00:40:22 Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-02 00:30:27 Re: build multiple indexes in single table pass?

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2008-04-02 00:53:23 Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-04-02 00:05:12 Re: Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work