| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers list" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Some ideas about Vacuum |
| Date: | 2008-01-16 19:26:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10801161126w6450fbbco97e4f4ce8ead9767@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 16, 2008 7:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think it's going to work too well, though, not without major
> changes at least.
Well, I know it's really not doable with the current behaviour of WAL.
I just wanted to point this feature request because we had it a few
times and having one cluster per database is not really smart and it
wasn't too far from the subject.
> What would happen when you restore a PITR backup of
> just one database? Would the other databases still be there in the
> restored cluster?
In a perfect world, you should be able to trigger the PITR for only
one database of the cluster with the other databases still running.
It's especially interesting on a shared database server.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-16 20:46:25 | Re: COPY encoding |
| Previous Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2008-01-16 19:10:40 | Re: Some ideas about Vacuum |