| From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances |
| Date: | 2007-12-27 08:41:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10712270041j5e1178eftb2ab180b9f6a3c1f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Dec 27, 2007 7:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Enables <firstterm>assertion</> checks in the server, which test for
> many <quote>cannot happen</> conditions. This is invaluable for
> code development purposes, but the tests slow things down a little.
>
> Maybe we ought to put that more strongly --- s/a little/significantly/,
> perhaps?
+1. It seems closer to the reality.
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-12-27 08:47:59 | Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2007-12-27 07:39:51 | Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 |