Re: like/ilike improvements

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: like/ilike improvements
Date: 2007-09-22 08:37:22
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10709220137o2071d19cl81e6c9a6638f80a2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On 9/21/07, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> It applied cleanly for me.

Yes, it seems something was screwed in my tree. I didn't notice you
commited the patch I applied before Greg's patch.
Anyway, I'm starting with a clean tree containing your fix and what
Tom commited but I have to import the data again due to the catalog
version bump :).

New results coming soon.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-09-22 10:06:57 Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-21 23:09:02 Re: Text <-> C string

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2007-09-22 11:20:24 Re: like/ilike improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-21 23:09:02 Re: Text <-> C string