Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dan Harris" <fbsd(at)drivefaster(dot)net>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs
Date: 2007-02-13 22:49:36
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10702131449x480219d7pfd6797b7ca31ad2d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dan,

On 2/13/07, Dan Harris <fbsd(at)drivefaster(dot)net> wrote:
> Having upgraded to 2.6.18 fairly recently, I am *very* interested in
> what caused the throughput to drop in 2.6.18? I haven't done any
> benchmarking on my system to know if it affected my usage pattern
> negatively, but I am curious if anyone knows why this happened?

I think you misread the graph. PostgreSQL 8.2 seems to be
approximately 20% faster with kernel 2.6.18 on the platforms tested
(and using tweakers.net benchmark).

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-02-13 22:52:54 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs
Previous Message Dan Harris 2007-02-13 22:21:07 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs