From: | "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: log_duration is redundant, no? |
Date: | 2006-09-16 11:56:35 |
Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10609160456q7ae43357tb19b358b71b2fba5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/16/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> It might make sense to log _what_ is going on, without telling all the
> little details, for example
>
> LOG: parse duration: 0.250 ms
> LOG: bind duration: 0.057 ms
> LOG: execute my_query: SELECT * FROM shop WHERE $1 = $2
> DETAIL: parameters: $1 = 'Clothes Clothes Clothes', $2 = 'Joe''s Widgets'
It's not really the idea when you use log_statement and log_duration.
Lines are completely different semantically speaking.
So you should have:
LOG: parse (log_statement)
LOG: duration: 0.250 ms (log_duration)
--
Guillaume
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-16 12:00:37 | Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-09-16 11:56:04 | Re: Tiny plpython fix |