Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Sven Geisler" <sgeisler(at)aeccom(dot)com>, "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP
Date: 2006-03-16 16:08:46
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10603160808y6c2f683csb74086b10c3cd40e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 3/16/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Can you try strace'ing some of the backend processes while the system is
> behaving like this? I suspect what you'll find is a whole lot of
> delaying select() calls due to high contention for spinlocks ...

Tom,

I think we can try to do it.

You mean strace -p pid with pid on some of the postgres process not on
the postmaster itself, does you? Do we need other options?
Which pattern should we expect? I'm not really familiar with strace
and its output.

Thanks for your help.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-16 16:34:58 Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP
Previous Message Guillaume Smet 2006-03-16 16:05:38 Re: PostgreSQL and Xeon MP