Re: Bulk DML performance

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: bill(dot)poole(at)ymail(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bulk DML performance
Date: 2025-03-13 11:29:23
Message-ID: 1d30825fd5b0f65ad02406128248341051cdca19.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2025-03-13 at 12:28 +0100, I wrote:
> Then the best you can do is to use COPY rather than INSERT.
> It will perform better (but now vastly better).

Sorry, I meant "*not* vastly better".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bill.poole 2025-03-13 13:04:53 RE: Bulk DML performance
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-03-13 11:28:09 Re: Bulk DML performance