| From: | "Chris Hoover" <revoohc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Scott Mead" <scottiebo(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org Admin" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Questions on pg_dump |
| Date: | 2008-07-18 20:58:20 |
| Message-ID: | 1d219a6f0807181358nca79789l2cc0bce9e3ab9a25@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
We understand that. The question is why is an uncompressed Fc format so
much larger than a straight dump? Is the so bad it takes almost 5% extra
space?
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Scott Mead <scottiebo(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Sorry I'm not responding to the list, I am not allowed to post from
> my corporate account, and this account is not subscribed to the admin
> list.
>
> -Z 0 means no compression. You'll want to stick with the default
> or -Z 9 for highest compression.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> --Scott
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Govind | 2008-07-19 08:00:53 | Database Link |
| Previous Message | chris | 2008-07-18 19:48:06 | Re: answer my question, please!!! |