| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk (hash_mem) |
| Date: | 2020-07-07 03:48:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1cdd4ce13191408d1c40f44f994d42c84ac8b339.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 15:59 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> I agree that it's good to wait for actual problems. But the
> > challenge
> > is that we can't backport an added GUC.
> >
>
> Is it because we won't be able to edit existing postgresql.conf file
> or for some other reasons?
Perhaps "can't" was too strong of a word, but I think it would be
unprecedented to introduce a GUC in a minor version. It could be a
source of confusion.
If others think that adding a GUC in a minor version would be
acceptable, please let me know.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-07-07 04:57:08 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk (hash_mem) |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-07-06 10:29:29 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk (hash_mem) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-07-07 04:57:08 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk (hash_mem) |
| Previous Message | 曾文旌 | 2020-07-07 03:47:16 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |