Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Holger Hoffstätte <holger(at)applied-asynchrony(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21
Date: 2025-09-15 06:35:00
Message-ID: 1b9ee295-8cf8-4a94-87c8-f10e08cb5292@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12.09.25 09:47, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>  As a small style request, I would flip the conditional around so
>> that the new code appears first.  I see that we don't do this very
>> consistently in the existing code, but maybe we can start a new
>> trend. ;-)
> I knew this would come up since I pondered the same thing :D
> As you said, the existing code is not consistent, but I can switch this
> to let the new code appear first, if you prefer.
> A new patch is attached.

I have committed this one. For the remaining issue on arm, let's wait
for some additional reviews.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Чумак Антон 2025-09-15 06:35:23 [PATCH] Introduce unified support for composite GUC options
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-09-15 06:27:59 Re: Fix missing EvalPlanQual recheck for TID scans