Re: Alter index rename concurrently to

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, aaklychkov(at)mail(dot)ru, "[pgdg] Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Alter index rename concurrently to
Date: 2018-11-14 16:13:02
Message-ID: 1b66d484-61a3-dc3f-76b0-fd82ec513212@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25/10/2018 19:35, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>> > OK, I can refine those descriptions/comments.  Do you have any concerns
>> > about the underlying principle of this patch?
>>
>> Patch with updated comments to reflect your input.

> I didn't found any issue, so the patch looks in a very good shape.

Committed, thanks all.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-14 16:32:15 Re: [Bug Fix]ECPG: cancellation of significant digits on ECPG
Previous Message Raúl Marín Rodríguez 2018-11-14 16:11:17 Re: [PATCH] Memory leak in pg_config