From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 application time |
Date: | 2025-01-21 18:52:30 |
Message-ID: | 1b45f81d-4e99-4813-a2c6-72bf5fd80980@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12.01.25 00:19, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
> On 1/4/25 13:39, Paul Jungwirth wrote:
>> These updates fix a problem in the unaccent contrib module. When I
>> added a new parameter to get_func_namespace, I changed a call there.
>> Then I when took out that parameter, I didn't update the extension
>> again. Otherwise these are the same as the v46 patches.
>
> Hi Hackers,
>
> Here is another set of commits. Based on discussion on the thread about
> Index AM API Cleanup [1], I decided that I should just always make FOR
> PORTION OF infer its intersect proc from whatever intersect op is used
> by temporal foreign keys (even though we don't have a way to get an
> intersect op for non-range/multirange types yet). This means we need one
> less GiST support proc, which seems like a nice improvement.
>
> I also fixed the RESTRICT commit where a change previously was included
> in a later commit that should have been included there.
>
> Rebased to 29dfffae0a, fixing a merge conflict + crash with the NOT
> ENFORCED commit.
I have committed the fix for foreign key NO ACTION (patch 0002, this did
not require patch 0001). I will study the proposed fix for RESTRICT
(patches 0001 and 0003) next.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mahendra Singh Thalor | 2025-01-21 18:56:17 | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-01-21 18:50:23 | Re: New feature request for adding session information to PostgreSQL transaction log |