Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 蔡松露(子嘉) <zijia(at)taobao(dot)com>, "Cai, Le" <le(dot)cai(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, 萧少聪(铁庵) <shaocong(dot)xsc(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-04-13 08:37:14
Message-ID: 1a419225-916e-2387-fc8e-745cb30d69ee@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/13/20 1:57 PM, 曾文旌 wrote:
>> [tushar(at)localhost bin]$ tail -20 pg_upgrade_dump_13592.log
>> pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR: pg_type array OID value not set when in binary upgrade mode
> I found that the regular table also has this problem, I am very unfamiliar with this part, so I opened another email to consult this problem.
>
ohh. Thanks.

--
regards,tushar
EnterpriseDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-04-13 08:40:31 Re: Corruption during WAL replay
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-04-13 08:30:15 Re: doc review for parallel vacuum