| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring |
| Date: | 2024-04-18 09:39:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1a3a2f2e-9705-45ee-a2c8-6fd15b53ad67@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/18/24 09:10, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 10:54:56AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
>> I've added an open item [1], because what's one open item when you can
>> have two? (me)
>
> And this is still an open item as of today. What's the plan to move
> forward here?
AFAIK the plan is to replace the asserts with actually resetting the
rs_empty_tuples_pending field to 0, as suggested by Melanie a week ago.
I assume she was busy with the post-freeze AM reworks last week, so this
was on a back burner.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-04-18 09:54:23 | Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-04-18 09:37:58 | Re: Combine headerscheck and cpluspluscheck scripts |