From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Adding locks statistics |
Date: | 2025-08-12 15:42:48 |
Message-ID: | 1a236172c7dda72939e4293657a90536cce7dd16.camel@j-davis.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2025-08-12 at 09:37 +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> It can be used for example for:
>
> 1. checking if "waits" is close to "requests". Then it means you
> usually have to
> wait before acquiring the lock, which means you may have a
> concurrency issue.
>
> 2. lock_timeout and deadlock_timeout tuning (lock_timeout is visible
> only in the
> logs if log_min_error_statement is set appropriately).
>
> 3. checking the "requests"/"fastpath" ratio to see if
> "max_locks_per_transaction"
> needs tuning (see c4d5cb71d2).
> "
>
> Do these seem like useful use cases?
Those seem plausibly useful, but I don't recall needing that exact
information myself, and I wanted to hear more from others.
For instance, a view could be helpful to diagnose concurrency issues,
but I think that's worth discussing in more detail to see what kinds of
issues it can help with and how it complements other approaches. I
suspect when we get into the details, different people (or different
situations) would want slightly different information out of that view.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2025-08-12 15:45:44 | meson: Add _static and _shared suffixes to the library names |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-08-12 15:36:52 | Re: Update LDAP Protocol in fe-connect.c to v3 |