Re: Avoid streaming zero-filled WAL switch padding

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Avoid streaming zero-filled WAL switch padding
Date: 2026-09-10 13:23:20
Message-ID: 1FA4D4FB-941B-44D5-804E-B13864337996@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Sehrope,

On 9 Sep 2026, Sehrope Sarkuni wrote:
> See attached for a patch atop your v2 to address 1-3. The 0001 is your
> v2 patch rebased and the additions are in 0002.

Thank you for the review and fixes! Your changes look good to me.
The byte-count check is a useful addition: matching files alone did not
prove that we actually skipped the padding. Let's consider your v3 as the
current version.

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-09-10 13:28:34 Re: Review items for EXCEPT TABLE publication
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2026-09-10 13:20:12 Re: Rename PqMsg_Progress to PqMsg_ParallelWorkerProgress