Re: Who adds the "start transaction" and "commit" to the intended SQL statement in "autocommit" mode?

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Who adds the "start transaction" and "commit" to the intended SQL statement in "autocommit" mode?
Date: 2023-02-19 02:54:35
Message-ID: 1F6B3C0A-DBF8-4821-9FAE-CB1B6D5B2EB8@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Feb 18, 2023, at 18:52, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Historical trivia: PostgreSQL had a (backend) "autocommit" GUC in 7.3
> only, which remained as
> a dummy GUC until 9.5 (see: https://pgpedia.info/a/autocommit.html ).

Well, that was a pretty whacky idea. :-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com 2023-02-19 14:54:40 RE: Support logical replication of DDLs
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2023-02-19 02:52:37 Re: Who adds the "start transaction" and "commit" to the intended SQL statement in "autocommit" mode?