Re: index usage

From: "Daniel Caune" <daniel(dot)caune(at)ubisoft(dot)com>
To: "Ben" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: index usage
Date: 2006-07-28 19:23:01
Message-ID: 1E293D3FF63A3740B10AD5AAD88535D202B655F1@UBIMAIL1.ubisoft.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> De : pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] De la part de Ben
> Envoyé : vendredi, juillet 28, 2006 15:21
> À : pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Objet : [PERFORM] index usage
>
> I have a table with 37000 rows, an integer column, and an index on that
> column. I've got a function that returns an integer. When I do a select
> where I restrict that column to being equal to a static number, explain
> tells me the index will be used. When I do the same thing but use the
> function instead of a static number, explain shows me a full scan on the
> table.
>
> I must be missing something, because my understanding is that the function
> will be evaluated once for the statement and then collapsed into a static
> number for the filtering. But the results of the explain seem to imply
> that's not the case....?
>

Is your function IMMUTABLE, STABLE or VOLATILE?

--
Daniel

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben 2006-07-28 20:59:57 Re: index usage
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-07-28 19:22:28 Re: Performance with 2 AMD/Opteron 2.6Ghz and 8gig