RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp'" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
Date: 1999-09-28 10:03:00
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F748C0D2@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Hi, Vadim,

I had a problem compiling, message:

line: 1379
In function 'CreateCheckPoint'
storage size of 'delay' is unknown

It seems to hooch over the struct timeval. Ideas?

MikeA

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tatsuo Ishii [mailto:t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 11:55 AM
>> To: Vadim Mikheev
>> Cc: Ansley, Michael; 'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org';
>> 'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'
>> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
>>
>>
>> >I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
>> >
>> >Vadim
>>
>> Does this mean that now we can enjoy the WAL?:-)
>>
>> BTW, your WAL implementation will allow database recovery from log
>> files by using roll-forward or similar techniques?
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-09-28 10:10:35 RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-09-28 09:54:48 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-09-28 10:10:35 RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-09-28 09:54:48 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree