RE: [HACKERS] psql & query string length

From: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
To: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psql & query string length
Date: 1999-07-20 15:50:51
Message-ID: 1BF7C7482189D211B03F00805F8527F70ED06B@S-NATH-EXCH2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In order not to break it. I could just run the regression tests, I suppose,
but it always helps if you kind of know where you're going.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ansley, Michael [mailto:Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 1999 5:30 PM
>> To: 'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'
>> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psql & query string length
>>
>>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> buffer indefinitely extensible, I'd counsel fixing one bug
>> >> at a time...
>> I know, you're right.
>> I'm not trying to fix it, though, only trying to work out what it is
>> supposed to do in certain circumstances.
>>
>>
>> MikeA
>>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-20 16:47:21 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-07-20 15:42:54 Re: [HACKERS] Contributing