RE: RE: JDBC Timestamp Problem

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: RE: JDBC Timestamp Problem
Date: 2000-12-12 09:10:21
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B64D@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Yes, about 1-2 months ago ;-) The current CVS has the patch applied.

As soon as I get the domain problems sorted, I'm going to tripple check
Timestamp as I'd like to see the next release without the timestamp bug
reappearing...

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Kachnowich [mailto:khkachn(at)madweed(dot)ncsc(dot)mil]
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 5:30 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces
> Subject: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC Timestamp Problem
>
>
> I ran into a Timestamp problem a while back. The Postgres back end
> seems to return 2 digits for the milliseconds when the JDBC
> is expecting
>
> 3 digits (and 3 digits is correct).
>
> I am not sure if this has already been fixed or reported or even if it
> is the
> real problem at all.
>
> Does anyone know where I could checked to see if a patch is availalbe
> for this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken
>
>
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-12-12 09:13:20 RE: JDBC Drop/Create problem?
Previous Message Luis Zarza 2000-12-11 23:10:57 ODBC and Postgres large objects