RE: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

Yes please. It would be a good place to start from existing views.

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 9:29 AM
To: 'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Mount [mailto:petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk]
> Sent: 24 October 2000 12:43
> To: 'Tom Lane'; Peter Mount
> Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] RE: JDBC now needs updates for
> large objects
>
>
> Yes, the joins were one of the reasons I was going to do it.
>
> If no one starts a list by Saturday, then I'll start one when
> I go through
> JDBC.
>
> Peter

I have done some work like this for the next release of pgAdmin (mainly
views to allow easy reporting on db objects) - if you want copies of what I
have let me know, it might be a starting point.

Dave.