RE: [HACKERS] CVS

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Ansley, Michael'" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] CVS
Date: 1999-07-19 09:09:59
Message-ID: 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CA0CD@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Good question. I was going to do a fresh checkout tomorrow, but it would
be interesting to know about this.

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ansley, Michael [mailto:Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za]
Sent: 19 July 1999 09:41
To: 'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: [HACKERS] CVS

Once a new tag or release has been applied to the CVS tree, is a new
checkout required, or can I just update with the new tag? Do I need to
specify a tag when updating? If not, which branch is used? Are there
separate branches for 6.5 bug-fixes and 6.6 development?

MikeA

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1999-07-19 10:06:20 os.h
Previous Message Brian Bruns 1999-07-19 09:09:49 Re: [HACKERS] WAL: parallel logging