| From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: lo_unlink |
| Date: | 2000-05-15 14:16:37 |
| Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C5D2@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
I think we should...
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 1:29 PM
To: PostgreSQL-development
Cc: PostgreSQL-interfaces
Subject: [INTERFACES] lo_unlink
In looking through the documention programmers guide, I don't see any
mention of lo_unlink(). Isn't that the only way to remove large objects
from the database? Shouldn't we mention that?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-15 14:37:52 | Re: Proposal for fixing numeric type-resolution issues |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-15 14:15:53 | Re: Dumping and reloading stuff in 6.5.3 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2000-05-15 17:38:16 | Re: jdbc 7.0 fix for off by one errors. |
| Previous Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2000-05-15 13:43:38 | Re: Missing features in JDBC driver |