From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
Cc: | "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Date: | 2000-05-02 11:30:40 |
Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C544@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
I could get make jdbc2 to build the jar file, as it involves simply
changing the rules.
ie, currently we have the following:
jdbc2: ...rule...
action...
I would have to change it to something like:
jdbc2: realjdbc2 jar
realjdbc2: ...rule...
action...
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 12:01 PM
To: Peter Mount
Cc: 'Thomas Lockhart'; Lamar Owen; PostgreSQL-development;
PostgreSQL-interfaces
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
> The jar file isn't built automatically in 7.0. You'll have to use:
>
> make jdbc2 jar
>
> The reason for this is partly on how make works, and partly because of
> the kludge we have for handling the different API versions (like
> JDBC1.1, JDBC2 etc)
Oops, my book says it will generate a postgresql.jar file. If it isn't
going to that, I will have to change my book.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-05-02 11:32:08 | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-02 11:15:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-05-02 11:32:08 | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-05-02 11:15:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |