RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

Yes, the README does need updating. CHANGELOG should be up to date. If
not, I'll have to re-commit it.

I'm hoping to have the next three evenings free...

Peter

--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Lockhart [mailto:lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 6:16 AM
To: Lamar Owen; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development;
PostgreSQL-interfaces; peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

> otoh, how close are you Peter (hope you see this; I've blown away
> enough email to have lost your address) to posting a built jar file or
> whatever is usually provided? Should we post this somewhere on
> postgresql.org to help out? Should I post my recently built stuff?

Ah, found Peter's e-mail address in an obvious place (the jdbc source
tree).

Another question for Peter: would it be possible to update the README
file in the source tree, and other ancillary files? I know you've been
very busy, but even a brief fixup to adjust dates and version numbers
would be helpful for 7.0.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California