Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?

From: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
To: "'Hakan Tandogan'" <hakan42(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Date: 2000-02-22 16:39:03
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.

However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
included into CVS.

PS: The org.postgresql change has been done, but not fully tested.


Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hakan Tandogan [mailto:hakan42(at)gmx(dot)de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 1:28 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?


	Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the
best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was
about to
be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the
archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15.

	Just curious,

Hakan Tandogan                                       hakan(at)iconsult(dot)com

ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR                   Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen               Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77

"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"



pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Hakan TandoganDate: 2000-02-22 17:18:24
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Previous:From: Hakan TandoganDate: 2000-02-22 13:34:53
Subject: Postgres field that maps to java.sql.Types.BINARY?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group