From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Hakan Tandogan'" <hakan42(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? |
Date: | 2000-02-22 16:39:03 |
Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C23C@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
included into CVS.
PS: The org.postgresql change has been done, but not fully tested.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hakan Tandogan [mailto:hakan42(at)gmx(dot)de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 1:28 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Hi,
Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the
last
best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was
about to
be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the
CVS
archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15.
September.
Just curious,
Hakan
--
Hakan Tandogan hakan(at)iconsult(dot)com
ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
************
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hakan Tandogan | 2000-02-22 17:18:24 | RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? |
Previous Message | Hakan Tandogan | 2000-02-22 13:34:53 | Postgres field that maps to java.sql.Types.BINARY? |