| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: citext operator precedence fix |
| Date: | 2011-09-22 18:09:05 |
| Message-ID: | 1B1B284E-3A01-4B22-A8FD-A3FA68D6870E@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> That is the test file. The main SQL file is citext--1.0.sql. You'll actually need to bump the version number to 1.1, rename that file to citext--1.1.sql, and also add them to a citext--1.0--1.1.sql. There probably also needs to be a citext--unpackaged--1.1.sql file.
>
> Hmm, if there's a citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql and also
> citext--1.0--1.1.sql, is it really necessary to have
> citext--unpackaged--1.1.sql? Shouldn't the upgrade facility be able to
> just run both scripts?
No, because if 1.1 was installed on 8.4, you'd need the commands to move all its functions into the extension, not re-create them.
However, since this ships with core, it's probably not necessary, because theoretically no one will use it in 8.4, so the functions will never be unpackaged.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-09-22 18:14:35 | Re: citext operator precedence fix |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-09-22 18:07:28 | Re: citext operator precedence fix |