Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?
Date: 2019-02-12 16:45:49
Message-ID: 1AE9FDF2-3689-49B2-81D0-39E94C600541@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> The part about having a unified release-note archive somewhere else is
> still WIP. The ball is in the web team's court on that, I think.

Yes - we are going to try one thing with the existing way we load docs to try to avoid
additional structural changes. If that doesn’t work, we will reconvene
and see what we need to do.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2019-02-12 16:54:04 Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?
Previous Message Dave Page 2019-02-12 16:28:07 Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs?