Re: headerscheck ccache support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: headerscheck ccache support
Date: 2025-11-28 13:10:53
Message-ID: 19a58e38-3477-4d53-8341-a0165641de35@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.11.25 13:59, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Nov-28, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>
>> I could not apply patches cleanly. Am I missing something?
>
> Yeah, I couldn't get `git am` or `git apply` to accept the patches
> either, not even with -3. However, `patch -p1` does accept it. Weird.

I had another commit in my local branch that I needed to get the actual
compilations working, but which was unrelated to this discussion.
Apparently, this created enough fuzz to break the subsequent patches.
Here is the patch series again completely, but ignore the 0000 patch for
now.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2.1-0000-headerscheck-Use-LLVM_CPPFLAGS.patch text/plain 1.4 KB
v2.1-0001-headerscheck-ccache-support.patch text/plain 3.7 KB
v2.1-0002-ci-Run-headerscheck-and-cplusplucheck-in-parall.patch text/plain 919 bytes
v2.1-0003-headerscheck-Parallelize-by-writing-out-a-makef.patch text/plain 2.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-11-28 13:17:24 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-11-28 13:08:33 Re: Simplify code building the LR conflict messages