Re: Compression of bigger WAL records

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compression of bigger WAL records
Date: 2026-01-16 16:17:21
Message-ID: 19C9772F-9377-4ABA-88CF-F5B7C35C5A4C@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Fujii!

Thanks for the review, I'll address your feedback soon.

> On 16 Jan 2026, at 20:44, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Would it make more sense to keep the current behavior
> and add a new feature to compress entire WAL records whose size exceeds
> the specified threshold?

That's a very good idea! We don't need to replace current behavior, we can just complement it.
I'll implement this idea!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-01-16 16:14:54 Re: [PATCH] pl: fix can not build free-thread for plpython extension like 3.14t