| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCMS question |
| Date: | 2007-02-22 07:42:44 |
| Message-ID: | 19998.1172130164@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org> writes:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 00:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not particularly. We keep hearing from various advocates that
>> $foo-is-better-than-CVS, but the preferred value of $foo changes with
>> amazing frequency, and none of the arguments seem to justify the pain
>> of converting.
> Some of the other options just seem to have much nicer user interfaces. I was
> playing with Bacula and they just changed to Subversion. It really is much
> nicer than the CVS they used to use. Git seems interesting as well. I guess
> Subversion and git are the two big ones right now. What would you look for if
> you were to check out new SCMSes? Would you want distributed like Git or
> centralized like CVS/Subversion?
I think you just made my point for me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2007-02-22 07:44:28 | Re: infinity and DATE type |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-22 07:40:55 | Re: infinity and DATE type |