Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH
Date: 2005-07-21 14:48:06
Message-ID: 19994.1121957286@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Another problem with this patch is the search-and-replace substitution
of "SECS_PER_MINUTE" for "60", when in point of fact there are two
different meanings of "60" in this context. For instance, this
code has no problem:

! int Log_RotationAge = 24 * 60;

but this code looks like it has a units error:

! int Log_RotationAge = HOURS_PER_DAY * SECS_PER_MINUTE;

You need a "MINS_PER_HOUR" or some such if you don't want people
having to look twice at the code.

BTW, if you actually wanted to improve readability, defining a
SECS_PER_YEAR value and replacing the various occurrences of
"36525 * 864" with it would help.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-07-21 15:01:23 Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-21 14:19:42 Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH