Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock
Date: 1999-12-16 03:46:31
Message-ID: 199912160346.WAA17074@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > Since the new parallel regression tests I've always had a few
> > lock NOTICE messages like the following.
>
> Interesting --- I had not run the parallel test for a while,
> but I tried it just now and got half a dozen of these:
> NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock
> (Otherwise the tests all passed.)
>
> Something's been broken fairly recently. Does anyone have an
> idea what changed?

Good question. I can't imagine what it would be. We didn't do much,
and parallel regression is not that old.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-16 04:03:08 Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning?
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-12-16 03:36:37 Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock