Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob
Date: 1999-12-16 01:17:44
Message-ID: 199912160117.UAA11097@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "Patrick Welche" <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "ethernet_ip_key" on "ethernet" using btree ( "ip" "network_ops" );
> > was generated by dumpall. "network_ops" apparently don't exist (not sure what
> > is should be called).
>
> Current sources dump this as "inet_ops". I think the problem in 6.5.*
> was caused by bogus entries in the pg_opclass table (same classname for
> inet and cidr types). You could try reaching in and changing the system
> table entries, but it might be safer just to live with manually patching
> the dump file until the next release.

Fixed in the current source tree.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-16 01:25:07 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help
Previous Message Ed Loehr 1999-12-16 00:14:57 Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning?