| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com |
| Cc: | jose soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com>, Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>, Dale Anderson <danderso(at)crystalsugar(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time |
| Date: | 1999-12-02 00:18:37 |
| Message-ID: | 199912020018.TAA16636@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> no, you won't ;-)
> further testing indicates that current_stamp like current, instead of
> now/now().
Now I am confused. You say there is a difference between them?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | kaiq | 1999-12-02 00:21:24 | Re: [GENERAL] Date & Time |
| Previous Message | Sascha Ziemann | 1999-12-01 23:15:40 | How can I alter a function? |