Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kane Tao <khtao(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jochen Topf <pgsql-general(at)mail(dot)remote(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
Date: 1999-11-24 16:48:21
Message-ID: 199911241648.LAA26492@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > would you like it to work? What parts are too complicated? If they only
> > *appear* to be so, then this is a documentation deficiency, otherwise we'd
> > need to think about it.
> I think the concept of user friendly design is universal. There should be
> one button in the middle of the screen you push and everything is done for
> you :) (refer to technical support if you need to know more :)

I refer to this as "helmet-ware". The software reads your mind, figures
out what you want it to do, and does it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Barkov 1999-11-24 16:59:02 ANNOUNCE UdmSearch
Previous Message Ian Phillips 1999-11-24 16:21:57 Re: PL/pgsql or C/C++