| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert |
| Date: | 1999-11-23 19:58:47 |
| Message-ID: | 199911231958.OAA11605@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Good point, but (AFAIK) you could only use it for tables that you were
> > > sure no other client was updating in parallel. Otherwise you might be
> > > updating a just-obsoleted tuple. Or is there a solution for that?
> > >
> > > > Is someone still working on the xid access ?
> > >
> > > I think we have the ability to refer to CTID in WHERE now, but not yet an
> > > access method that actually makes it fast...
> >
> > Hiroshi supplied a patch to allow it in the executor, and I applied it.
> >
>
> Bruce,could you apply my attached patch ?
> I have to add 3 new files but couldn't do 'cvs add'
> the files on my machine.
> Am I mistaken ?
> I couldn't understand the reason now.
Applied. No idea why the add didn't work there. It worked here.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-11-23 20:57:29 | RE: AW: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end |
| Previous Message | J. Roeleveld | 1999-11-23 19:57:40 | Fwd: [GENERAL] Problem with CREATE RULE <something> ON DELETE (PostgreSQL only executes the first expression) |