Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver

> It's me who added the function.
> I left it undocumented,sorry.
> Bruce,could you add an document on it ?

Done. Will commit soon.

>
> Bruce added a new index to pg_index.
> Index scan needs an information of pg_index.
> If we use the new index,we needs the information about the index
> in pg_index.
> Doesn't this cause a real cycle ?

Yes. I am using it for a pg_operator index too.

>
> I added the function in order to hold one tuple which causes a real
> cycle. The tuple in pg_index should be scanned sequentially.
>
> I don't think it's the best solution.
> Please change it if there's a better way.

I talked to Tom, and we think it is a good solution.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026