Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)
Date: 1999-11-18 22:28:41
Message-ID: 199911182228.RAA15750@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't see the same __arm32_ defines I have in 7.0 tree.
> > >
> > > You don't see them in REL6_5_PATCHES, you mean? So, you only applied
> > > them to CURRENT?
> >
> > Yes, only current. I suspect the original patch was too risky for the
> > stable tree.
>
> Ok; I am shipping those patches with the 6.5.3 RPM's. There are not
> major changes made by them -- just minor defines, the linux_arm
> template, etc. Do you want to re-review them for inclusion in
> REL6_5_PATCHES, or just wait?? They're only 2K.

We never seem to understand all the affects patches have, especially
when they affect s_lock.c or s_lock.h. Don'tthink they should appear
in 6.5.*. We can make a separate patch for ARM and put it in the
patches directory like we did for Alpha.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-18 22:31:51 Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-11-18 22:22:48 Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)