Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)
Date: 1999-11-18 21:47:39
Message-ID: 199911182147.QAA12394@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports


Applied. WIll appear in 7.0.

Is there a reason optimization was turned off. I have not applied that
fix.

>
> ------- Forwarded Message
>
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:54:15 -0800
> From: "David N. Welton" <davidw(at)prosa(dot)it>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit(at)bugs(dot)debian(dot)org>
> Subject: Bug#50518: ARM fixes
>
> Package: postgresql
> Version: 6.5.2-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> src/template/linux_arm:
> AROPT:crs
> CFLAGS:-O0
> SHARED_LIB:-fpic
> ALL:
> SRCH_INC:
> SRCH_LIB:
> USE_LOCALE:no
> DLSUFFIX:.so
> YFLAGS:-d
> YACC:bison -y
>
> In src/include/storage/s_lock.h,
>
> #if defined(__arm32__)
>
> would be better as:
>
> #if defined(__arm__)
>
>
> ...
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
> Apparently this is necessary for PostgreSQL to compile on ARM.
>
> --
> Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
> ========================================
> Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
> Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
> PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
> ========================================
> "A Song for the sabbath day. It is a good thing to
> give thanks unto the LORD, and to sing praises unto
> thy name, O most High." Psalms 92:1
>
>
>
> ************
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-18 22:02:21 Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-11-18 21:37:39 Re: [PORTS] ARM fixes (fwd)