Re: [SQL] HAVING in EXISTS-clause ...

From: marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] HAVING in EXISTS-clause ...
Date: 1999-11-12 07:55:30
Message-ID: 199911120755.IAA05120@feki.phoenix-edv.netzservice.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hello all out there,

> involving aggregate functions as sub-selects in FROM. So it's probably
> not worth any effort to add more code to a routine that shouldn't exist
> in the first place; we've got to work on the fundamental problem

What makes me nervous is the fact, that I've seen limitations with
the length of the sql statements, some hidden problems here and there
and we want to use PostgreSQL in a research projects the next year
and we're writing now some oo->rdbms mapper software and therefore
we produce some "non-typical" statements and see those limitations
(and perhaps even better: some are not documented).

Marten

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message <Miguel Sofer 1999-11-12 15:13:55 Rules and referential integrity
Previous Message marten 1999-11-12 07:42:26 Re: [SQL] Nested Views take forever