| From: | marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
| Cc: | Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za, stuart(at)comodo(dot)net, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] 8k limit |
| Date: | 1999-10-27 06:41:02 |
| Message-ID: | 199910270641.IAA16655@feki.phoenix-edv.netzservice.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
>
> There has been discussion of fixing this, eg by making a subdirectory
> tree for LOs, but I'd rather see us put our effort into eliminating
> the tuple length limit.
>
This would be very nice - because this also means to get SQL
statements that may really be 8k long !
Perhaps you all remember a rather complex view statement I posted here
some days ago, where postgresql said something like "rule too large" and
this seems to be a limitation for me. Actually as a user one does not know
when this limit is reached by the system.
All "we" (the users :-)) know about the 8192 byte limit of an SQL statement,
but this is not the whole truth.
Marten
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 1999-10-27 08:46:28 | RE: [INTERFACES] pgAdmin connection error on NT and W98 |
| Previous Message | Tim Joyce | 1999-10-27 06:29:58 | Re: [INTERFACES] 8k limit |