Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long)
Date: 1999-10-26 05:25:43
Message-ID: 199910260525.BAA21896@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> This is a followup to a message I wrote in June about reworking the fmgr
> interface. I've had a couple of good ideas (I think ;-)) since then,
> but there are some parts of the proposal that still need work before
> implementation can begin.
>
> I could particularly use some feedback from Jan and anyone else who's
> worked with function-call handlers: does this design eliminate the
> kluges that you've had to use in the past? If not, what else is needed?

Sounds good. My only question is whether people need backward
compatibility, and whether we can remove the compatiblity part of the
interface and small overhead after 7.1 or later?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-26 05:27:54 Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-26 05:10:09 Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis an amazing time sink in huge relations)