From: | Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) |
Date: | 1999-10-11 16:56:30 |
Message-ID: | 199910111656.KAA17620@biology.nmsu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> apocalypse ;)
But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?
Isn't the point to avoid naming conflicts. Symlinks won't help that,
surely.
I agree; underscores are a pain. If you must go this direction, I
suggest hyphens (-).
Cheers,
Brook
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brook Milligan | 1999-10-11 16:58:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-11 15:43:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brook Milligan | 1999-10-11 16:58:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-11 15:43:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) |