From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Sharoiko <os(at)rsu(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] netmask |
Date: | 1999-09-27 16:18:26 |
Message-ID: | 199909271618.MAA01702@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
As I mentioned I already applied it.
> Hello!
>
> I think this is a bug. But it's said not to report any bugs unless you're
> sure that it's a bug, so I'm asking heer is this a bug?
>
> template1=> select netmask('10.0.0.1/0');
> netmask
> ---------------
> 255.255.255.255
> (1 row)
>
> This happens because
> word << shift
> uses only 5 low bits of shift (this is described in docs on Intel processor).
> Running
> word << 32
> on sparc also gives unchanegd word
>
> I've included a patch for 6.5.
> I think it will work with 6.5.1
>
> --
> Oleg.
Content-Description:
[Attachment, skipping...]
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-27 16:47:25 | Re: [GENERAL] Anyone doing a native NT port? |
Previous Message | David Heinecke | 1999-09-27 16:16:36 | Anyone doing a native NT port? |