Re: [PATCHES] RE: [HACKERS] Index access using multi-column indices

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] RE: [HACKERS] Index access using multi-column indices
Date: 1999-09-27 15:38:05
Message-ID: 199909271538.LAA15571@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I will apply it today. I am working through my mailbox after a very
busy Summer.

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Hiroshi Inoue
> > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 1999 5:52 PM
> > To: pgsql-patches
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Index access using multi-column indices
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Currently,only the first column of multi-column indices
> > is used to find start scan position of Indexscan-s.
> >
> > To speed up finding scan start position,I have changed
> > _bt_first() to use as many keys as possible.
> >
> > I'll attach the patch here.
> >
>
> Seems this isn't committed yet.
> If there's no objection,I will commit this patch to current tree.
>
> Regards.
>
> Hiroshi Inoue
> Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp
>
> ************
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-27 15:42:33 Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union
Previous Message Ansley, Michael 1999-09-27 15:35:16 RE: [HACKERS] Lexxing and yaccing...