| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? |
| Date: | 1999-09-20 13:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | 199909201321.JAA18372@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
> >
> > If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can
> > test it here. I don't know of any portability problems with shared
> > memory children.
>
> I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris
> (on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry
> does this work under MS Windows.
This code was not added for MS Windows, so it is anyone's guess whether
it needs it. Let's remove it and see.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-20 13:23:19 | Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach? |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-09-20 09:59:05 | Re: Referential Integrity In PostgreSQL |